Article: Two Horowitz protesters arrested

Media Credit: MPD
Grace Mitchell was arrested Wedensday night on suspicion of resisting law enforcement

Media Credit: MPD
Ball State University junior Cassandra Reed was arrested on suspicion of resisting law enforcement and three counts of battery of a police officer.
Prank pizza call, 50-foot projection, attempted pie-throwing greet speaker at Ball State
From Staff Reports
From: Ball State Daily News on Line
UPDATE: NewsLink Indiana reports that both Cassandra Reed and Grace Mitchell have been released on bond.
Look for updates at DNOnline and in tomorrow's Daily News. See more coverage on NewsWatch at 9 p.m., on CardinalVision 57 and Muncie Comcast channel 61.
Conservative activist David Horowitz got a 50-foot "not welcome" sign, 15 cheese pizzas and nearly a cream pie in the face before speaking at Ball State University about political agendas of professors Wednesday night.
Two women were arrested by university police near the Teachers College in connection with the pie-throwing incident, but the identity of the pizza pranksters remains a mystery.
Sgt. John Foster said one woman, Ball State junior Cassandra Reed, ran at Horowitz with a cream pie in her hand. Director of Public Safety Gene Burton stood between the two, and he and other officers were hit with the pie, Foster said."Gene saw it coming and got in the middle," he said.The police pursued Reed and Grace Mitchell, Columbia City, who was with Reed at the time of the attack, Foster said.
Reed was arrested on suspicion of resisting law enforcement and three counts of battery of a police officer, and Mitchell was arrested on suspicion of resisting law enforcement, Delaware County Jail officials said. Reed remained in jail on $17,500 bail, but Mitchell was released Wednesday night on a $2,500 bond, officials said.
Horowitz, whose speech was sponsored by the College Republicans, Young America's Foundation and Student Government, said he hoped the people involved in the pie incident would be punished.
Horowitz received a similar welcome during stops at other Indiana colleges. During a speech at Butler University in 2005, he was struck in the face with a pie. A few days later while speaking at Purdue, a streaker interrupted his speech.
Horowitz has a history with Ball State. In 2006, he wrote "The ProFessors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America" about how universities teach students what, not how, to think. He criticized George Wolfe, professor of music and coordinator of outreach programs for the Center for Peace and Conflict Studies, claiming he had no qualifications to teach peace studies.
SGA President Asher Lisec said the organization was not aware Horowitz was a controversial speaker when it decided to co-sponsor him and did not think he would be speaking across party lines. However, she said she supports activities that encourage students to be more politically active and aware.
"Political conversation is something that is lacking at the university level," she said. "I'm happy people are taking an interest in politics, but I don't think it should have been taken to the level it was taken to."
To protest Horowitz's speech, students projected a sign saying "Horowitz not Welcome" on the south side of Teachers College. In addition, someone placed a fake order for 15 pizzas and had them sent under Horowitz's name to the site of the speech.B
en Heighway, assistant manager of the Pizza Hut on Wheeling Ave., said an order for about $230 worth of pizzas and breadsticks was placed around 4 p.m. or 5 p.m. to be delivered to Horowitz at Teachers College at 7 p.m. All the food had to be thrown away.
"I went with the driver because we had a lot of food and when we got there a lady was like we can't come in," he said. "A teacher came out and asked if we needed help, but soon another girl came out and said we needed to leave because I guess other stuff was happening."
Despite the problems, Horowitz's speech began about five minutes behind schedule.
"You can't get a good education if teachers are only telling you half of the truth," Horowitz told the audience of more than 100 people. "If you're getting an instruction that excludes other points of view you won't come out smarter."
When Horowitz attended college, he said his professors graded assignments based on how he made and assembled arguments. Now, universities are less academic and scholarly, but more political, he said.
"You don't go to a doctor expecting to get a speech about the war in Iraq and you shouldn't get one from your teachers," he said.
During the speech, some audience members yelled at Horowitz that he was only controversial because he was a liar.
Horowitz said he did not lie, and such accusations were simply misinformed character attacks.
He also said feminism was a leftist ideal and Ball State's Women's Studies program taught only one side of the issue.
Betsy Mills, SGA president pro-tempore, told Horowitz that she had been taught in her women's studies classes to ask why things happen and look at both sides of the issue. Horowitz replied by saying feminism is not equality, and Mills was not receiving information on both sides.
When he talked about Wolfe, Horowitz said a professor who teaches saxophone does not have the qualifications to teach peace studies. For the same reason, he said it was also unethical for Wolfe to recruit students for the Center for Peace and Conflict Studies.
While Wolfe did not attend the event, he said he did not condone the mistreatment Horowitz faced on campus Wednesday. The provocative acts, which he said were probably designed to intimidate Horowitz, actually sent a bad message.
"Horowitz has put himself in a situation where he speaks about highly politically charged issues and uses language that's offensive and raises people's emotions," Wolfe said in a phone interview after the event. "When people act on these negative emotions and feelings in a bad way they strengthen his position which is counter-productive to what they intended to do."

10 Comments:
I am glad to see you posting again.
I wish the byline of your book was "Examples indicating a trend" as opposed to "The Most Dangerous Academics."
That byline completely undermined the work. Which is sad, because it appears that the primary point of The Professors was that the idiotic ideas of the modern and post-modern era keep undermining our society. Your attempt to point this out was undermined by an idiotic byline.
As for your current post.
The brain cells that I had conditioned at the State University tell me that the two arrested protestors are social heroes and are victims of a conservative conspiracy. Their rights to engage in free speech was infringed when the police arrested them for trying to stop you from speaking.
Yes, I know that the statement that free speach includes stopping conservatives from engaging is free speech is a paradox, but, paradox is the foundation of progressive politics.
Good luck. I hope some people catch on to what you've said in The Professors and realize the dangers we face from our radicalized professoriat.
Book titles and bylines are made up by the publisher and not the author.
They go for what they think will be provocative and sell more books.
As a writer I have found this to be an egregious problem from time to time.
Difficult to change that scenario, too, the people at the publishing house actually think they are contributing.
.
Please have a word with your editors - the article mentions two women but features the mug-shots of two young men.
It is sad to see that Rat's can't let the exchange of ideas happen. They will always lose if that happens. You should check this blog to see what the 'professors' are up at WSU here in Washington state see this site http://www.palousitics.com/
The one 'professor' in comparative ethnic studies at Washington State University actual called a student a $hitbag see video at the above site.
Dave, while you may not be welcome on some campuses, you are always welcome wherever I can see and hear you. You rock!
And for my commentary... "Wolfe" said that you use offensive language... is it that you simply disagree with the mainstream thought in these places? If that is the case, then no wonder!
Dave, thanks for living!!
Mark
Hartford CT
PS You know what would really get me miffed? If I were to see that you are coming to a local college campus near me and the people there making it so that you don't appear... Meeting you or seeing you speak is my freedom and I want to exercise it!
If you are not a liberal by age twenty, you have no heart. If you are not a conservative by age forty, then you have no brain. Liberalism is what is being taught today. Common sense and rational thought overcome this in most cases. It is amazing how free speech is no longer encouraged on college campuses. This is very troubling.
It is always regrettable when a planned speech is interrupted. But $17,000 seems a steep price for pie throwing. Pies hardly seem like devices that can seriously considered assault.
For the record, I am a painfully rational liberal. The conflict at hand is not about liberalness or conservativeness. The conflict is about ignorance. No one can justifiably advocate or denounce an idea without a full scope of the idea. Ad hominem attacks and literal pie-throwing are masturbatory. When you begin to blindly advocate a "side" you embarrass everyone who takes their views seriously.
As for anonymous posters: if you fear recourse you must not identify with your views strongly. If you fear the small discomfort of registry you must not advocate your views strongly.
Kirk, I agree with nearly all you have said, though I will disagree with your view of Anonymous Posters and ask you why that if you feel that way do you keep your profile private, and do not use your full name in your postings?
Those two women arrested look like guys.
Kirk is wrong. An imminent threat to anyone of an unconsented touching is an assault, which is in itself a criminal offense. If the actual contact follows an additional offense is committed. Whether the threatened touching is by a pie or a bullet, there is still an assault, the different means of threatened contact only affect the degree of the offense. I hope the jurisdiction carries forth with prosecution to make the point that physical interference with anyone's exercise of First Amendment rights will not be tolerated.
Post a Comment
<< Home